|
Post by Gregg Carey on Nov 30, 2007 22:37:50 GMT -5
Man, this sucks!! It's based on LUCK!! I hope the host WILL REVEAL the answers of all matches. I really don't like these BLIND challenges. Too many rigged challenges in the past.
|
|
|
Post by Katie Gallagher on Nov 30, 2007 23:04:55 GMT -5
ahhaha icic mine was rock paper paper scissors rock
|
|
|
Post by Tom Westman on Nov 30, 2007 23:17:28 GMT -5
ulong might not all turn it in.
|
|
|
Post by Gregg Carey on Nov 30, 2007 23:22:09 GMT -5
Oh, can we be that lucky?
|
|
|
Post by Wanda Shirk on Nov 30, 2007 23:43:36 GMT -5
This challenge is stupid
|
|
|
Post by Wanda Shirk on Nov 30, 2007 23:47:27 GMT -5
It does not reflect teamwork at all! And to vote someone off because of this is just totally unfair, especially when you have a strong tribe like ours. This sucks man, big time
|
|
|
Post by Caryn Groedel on Dec 1, 2007 0:18:39 GMT -5
It does not reflect teamwork at all! And to vote someone off because of this is just totally unfair, especially when you have a strong tribe like ours. This sucks man, big time I agree, this challenge isnt fair if we end up losing, but its a game I guess! Everyone please make sure that you take the challenge as I almost missed it myself originally!!
|
|
|
Post by Sophia Bush on Dec 1, 2007 19:39:54 GMT -5
You are battling the other person, you aren't guessing.
|
|
|
Post by Sophia Bush on Dec 1, 2007 19:41:38 GMT -5
Oh and Gregg, don't accuse me of rigging. I post scores to ALL challenges and you can even see when you did the challenge and how long it took you
|
|
|
Post by Gregg Carey on Dec 1, 2007 20:57:40 GMT -5
I didn't accuse you of rigging. I said I've been in too many games that have been rigged...and I'm leary of "blind" challenges.
|
|
|
Post by Willard Smith on Dec 1, 2007 23:44:17 GMT -5
Good Luck Korror, we can do it!!
|
|
|
Post by Sophia Bush on Dec 2, 2007 0:15:03 GMT -5
Oh, sorry I misread it. I will post what the other person put as well.
|
|
|
Post by Tom Westman on Dec 2, 2007 21:28:23 GMT -5
ok i am pissed.
|
|
|
Post by Wanda Shirk on Dec 2, 2007 21:31:57 GMT -5
So am I...we don't deserve this
|
|
|
Post by Caryn Groedel on Dec 2, 2007 21:34:14 GMT -5
I dont understand, there was no winner in the last round so why didnt they do it again, we could have tied them and then went on to a tiebreaker!
Am I wrong about that??
|
|
|
Post by Gregg Carey on Dec 2, 2007 21:55:34 GMT -5
no, that seems the most logical thing to do.
|
|
|
Post by Caryn Groedel on Dec 2, 2007 23:38:24 GMT -5
I am the one that complained. I thought it sucked that if there was no winner in Willard and Stephanie match that we could have tied them.
I sent her a PM and she sent me back this reply:
It was taking way too much time as it it. I was actually hoping for a tie in one match because 8 is an even number.
This is going to be the only luck chalenge and I am sorry that your tribe lost, but I didn't want this challenge to be longer than it already was. And I have also been busy because of holiday shopping
This pissed me off since we obviously have all played the game hard and the other tribe were the ones that are wasting all the time and not responding to the challenges.
I was upset since I am sure we are all busy holiday shopping and to lose a member of my team who busted their asses last challenge because of it sucked. I asked her what she would do if some of us decided to quit because she was too busy to make it fair. That is why she has issued the tiebreaker.
If any of us are upset at my forwardness and being upset about the whole thing and the way it came down, then I apologize but frankly that is the person that I am. I give everything my all, and concentrate as hard as I can, and would never dismiss anyone cause of the lack of time. I believe in fairness!
|
|
|
Post by Wanda Shirk on Dec 3, 2007 0:25:35 GMT -5
Im totally supporting you on this Caryn. Im sure all of us are thinking of the same thing. Regarding the tie breaker, honestly I do not see the logic of her asking for a list of three items, but is there anything we can do to help you out Willard?
|
|
|
Post by Willard Smith on Dec 3, 2007 1:22:40 GMT -5
Im totally supporting you on this Caryn. Im sure all of us are thinking of the same thing. Regarding the tie breaker, honestly I do not see the logic of her asking for a list of three items, but is there anything we can do to help you out Willard? I totally agree, I apologize guys, I have been on the site twice today to check results and last I saw the host was checking. I just sent in my list for the tie breaker and I was happy to see you guys responded as I missed the boat on that one. Thanks and I hope I can at least get us a tie. I could care less how long the challenges are, doesnt matter, the host doesnt even post when it starts, so when it does end, it should at least end fair.
|
|
|
Post by Gregg Carey on Dec 3, 2007 7:41:54 GMT -5
Hey Caryn, your forwardness is a positive thing in our tribe. Not everyone read instructions or perceive situations the same way. So it's good to have a second opinion.
Yes, in agreement with willard, if there were start and end times posted for these challenges, then maybe Ulong and us will finish challenges in time. Hard to set our schedule when we have no sense of how long a challenge is anticipated to run.
|
|